A logging bill everybody can support (maybe)

Woodman, fell that tree.

Woodman, fell that tree.

Rep. Tom McClintock

Rep. Tom McClintock

Some people around here are so bitter about the demise of the timber industry, the spotted owl wouldn’t be an endangered species in their precincts–it would be an extinct species.

But Rep. Tom McClintock has proposed legislation that should bring a smile to their faces, save the taxpayers a few dollars, and may even be acceptable to the environmentalists who created the state of affairs we have today.

The legislation concerns trees that are torched in forest fires but still have salvage value. For example, the recent Rim Fire that destroyed 400 square miles of forest in the Stanislaus National Forest and Yosemite left an estimated one billion square feet of salvageable dead trees–enough to built 63,000 houses.

The U.S. Forest Service auctions off salvage rights to such trees–but only after going through an arduous environmental review process that can last over a year. Damaged trees must be removed within two years before they succumb to rot and insect damage, and become commercially worthless.

To maximize the harvest of these trees, McClintock has introduced a bill (HR 3138) that would waive environmental regulations so that salvage logging can begin quickly. McClintock said the legislation applies only “to lands where the environment has already been incinerated, and allows the government to be paid for the removal of already dead timber, rather than having the government pay someone else.”

As you would expect, people in communities where logging used to fuel the local economy are excited about the prospect of loggers getting much-needed work. As you would also expect, most environmentalists aren’t doing handsprings over this proposal.

Rep. Pete DeFazio (D., Oregon) said the waiver “would be a license to clear-cut the entire burn zone,” and said he supports more limited salvage logging.

Chad Hanson, research ecologist of the anti-logging John Muir Project, said it is almost always better to leave all dead trees in the forest because the trees provide critical habitat for insects such as beetles, which become food for woodpeckers.

But others have a different take. “You need to remove some of those trees so new ones can grow,” said Patrick Koepele, deputy executive director of the Tuolumne River Trust.

The House Subcommittee on Public Lands and Environmental Regulations held a hearing on the bill Oct. 3 and it now awaits action by the Committee on Natural Resources.

Given the chaos in Washington, it’s anybody guess how the bill will fair. But if the government’s going to salvage this wood, McClintock’s bill should be given serious consideration.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Economy, Environment, Politics and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to A logging bill everybody can support (maybe)

  1. Don Baumgart says:

    Hey George – You might consider saying who you are on your blog. I know everybody is supposed to know, but…
    -Don Baumgart

    • ag101board says:

      I know the bloggers handbook says to get your name and face front-and-center because…Well, it’s not clear to me how this will draw readers unless you’re a celebrity or well-known in your field.

      I decided to focus on the position of this blog (middle-of-the-road) and the quality of content, which will ultimately determine its success or failure.

      I might add some more biographical detail on the Home page, and I might even post a picture–if I can find the one I really like that was taken when I was 25.

  2. Don Baumgart says:

    It’s a matter of source identity.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s