Supes show-and-tell offers little real insight into candidates

Early reports on Thursday’s show-and-tell involving the supervisor candidates indicate it was a typical League of Women Voters production: Polite, eminently fair, but lacking in real substance.

The problem is the format of asking everybody to respond to a set of questions: If you’re a one-issue voter, this can work well if the right question is asked. But if you’re looking for the candidate with the best over-arcing vision of our future, you’ll have to look elsewhere.

Then there’s the questions. The candidates were questioned about NID’s response to the drought. Since the Board of Supervisors has no control over NID, the question was hardly relevant. Droughts come and go in California, and the long-term solution to the state’s water problem will come from Sacramento, not the Rood Center.

The LWV format benefits incumbents, because challengers have no real opportunity to call them out for their real or perceived shortcomings.  What we need is candidate debates, not q-and-a’s. Otherwise, we distract ourselves with silly debates over the placement of a banner supporting a candidate. If this is what decides elections, then we deserve the winners we get.

As things stand now, Hank Weston appears to be cruising to an easy victory in the Fourth District. The race between incumbent Terry Lamphier and challenger Dan Miller in the Third District boils down to whether we want supervisors’ votes to be 5-0 instead of the current 4-1.

ANOTHER THING: NCTV is unparalleled in its ability to broadcast the lunch breaks at supervisors’ meetings, but apparently couldn’t stir itself to broadcast the LWV forum live. The overflow crowd showed there was plenty of interest in the event. If NCTV is to get the community support it needs to survive, it needs to provide live coverage of events like this.

 

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Government, Politics, Public Policy and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Supes show-and-tell offers little real insight into candidates

  1. rlcrabb says:

    I attended the snoozefest. You’re right about TWV’s format; canned answers and little drama. It will be interesting to see if Jedidiah Biagi’s neo-libertarian candidacy pulls enough votes from Weston to give Cole the victory.
    It was still fun to attend, just to talk to the people like me who regularly show up at these events. Some of us have been doing it for 20+ years. You always learn more about what’s going on in local politics out in the hallway.

  2. Patty says:

    You said is brother. The forum of judge candidates at the Tea Party Wednesday the 26th was formatted the same way, and with the same results. I missed 95% of the judge candidate forum at the Alta Sierra Country Club today because of an emergency. This particular forum was hosted by the court reformers. Only three of the five candidates showed up. The audience was allowed to ask any questions. There were only 5 people in the audience. It wasn’t advertised well and I wonder why?????

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s