Journalism that stands apart in The Union

Jeff “Podunk” Pelline’s animus toward The Union is well-known in these parts–hell, he’s been obsessing about the place ever since they cut him loose several years ago. But his hatred of the paper can make him look like a fool, as his criticism of today’s edition shows.

Podunk’s latest complaint is that the paper gave its “prime real estate”–the upper right-hand corner of page one– to a story about 25 locals who traveled to San Francisco to participate in a pro-life march while “The Women’s March plays second fiddle to this ‘news’ on the first page.”

For those of you who aren’t familiar with the inner workings of newspapers, it has been believed for many years that the upper right-hand corner on page one is the most important spot in the newspaper, and that’s where the day’s most important story should go.

There’s little evidence that a reader’s eye actually gravitates to that spot–putting a big headline there helps–and an editor pointed out to me many years ago that we read left-to-right, not right-to-left. And as Podunk pointed out in a post on his blog earlier Sunday, a new report, “Journalism That Stands Apart,” recommends that newspapers make their stories more visual to remain relevant in the digital age.

Visual includes pictures, such as the three used to illustrate the local Women’s March contingent headed for Sacramento. In fact, that story combined with a roundup of the marches throughout the country got much more space on page one than the pro-life article, and even more space inside the paper.

Bottom line: The Women’s March was given much more prominence than the pro-life march and–I’m willing to bet–attracted a lot more readers.  Any fool but Pelline can see that.

This entry was posted in Jeff Pelline, Media, The Union newspaper, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Journalism that stands apart in The Union

  1. Todd Juvinall says:

    And it is no wonder he was tossed. Must have been for stupidity.

  2. Todd Juvinall says:

    I would like to see your views on the march itself. What I thought was most interesting was the “nasty” speech by Judd and Madonna’s screed. They were all outraged at Trump’s boast of pussy grabbing yet they spoke very nasty and even wore what they called a “pussyhat” and were proud of that. Maybe you could enlighten us from a liberal man’s perspective.

    • It’s a little late to feel offended by what Judd, Madonna and others had to say at the march. The Obamas and Hillary caught a lot worse flak from conservatives than Trump is getting now. Both sides are guilty of coarsening the public discourse in this country.

  3. Podunk is teeing off on The Union again today, this time for running an opinion piece by well-know local conservative George Rebane. In Pelline’s telling, this kind of content is “often predictable and monotonous, not inspiring, informative or uplifting.”

    Jeffie was apparently so upset that he missed the opinion piece right above Rebane’s, “Are abortion foes ignoring ramifications?,” in support of a woman’s right to an abortion by regular columnist Darrell Berkheimer. This is puzzling in light of Podunk’s recent criticism of a column by Terry McLaughlin opposing abortion.

    The reason he missed this, of course, is because it doesn’t fit his narrative that The Union caters to just an old, conservative audience, a selective use of the facts he apparently thinks his acolytes won’t notice. Maybe The Union could make Jeffie happy by offering a column to Reinette Senum, a well-known purveyor of alternative facts. LOL.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s